Ministry of Defence

Defence Equipment Plan and Major Projects Report

Mr Philip Dunne: I am pleased to place in the Library of the House the annual publication of the Defence Equipment Plan. Building on the progress outlined in the previous three equipment plans, we again have a stable and realistic programme of work that sets out a strong foundation on which to shape the future construct of the Armed Forces in the forthcoming Strategic Defence and Security Review (SDSR). We continue to plan for the future with confidence. The summer budget announcement outlined the Government’s commitment to grow the Defence budget by 0.5% above inflation. This will enable us to fulfil the commitment to grow the equipment budget by 1% above inflation year on year and to invest more than £160 billion on defence equipment and support over the next 10 years. The Equipment Plan sets out our plan, pre-SDSR, to spend £166 billion on capabilities the Armed Forces need over the 10 year planning period out to 2024-25. The Equipment Plan is being published in parallel with the NAO’s independent assessment into both the Equipment Plan and also 17 of the MOD’s largest projects known as the Major Projects Report. I welcome the NAO’s view that there are indications that the Equipment Plan will remain affordable for the rest of the Parliament if financial stability is maintained. Supporting this, the Major Project Report saw a fall in the reported cost of the projects for the second consecutive year. There are still improvements to be made in the ways that Defence procures and supports equipment, which the Defence Equipment and Support transformation programme and the establishment of the Single Source Regulations Office are seeking to address, but it is reassuring that the NAO acknowledge the continued progress we have been making. Throughout Annual Budget Cycle 2015 the focus was on ensuring the continued stability of the Equipment Plan, and ensuring that the levels of capability and financial risk were balanced. The Equipment Plan demonstrates that we achieved this, giving a stable baseline as we enter the Spending Review and SDSR.

Ministry of Justice

Implementation of the new Code of Practice for Victims of Crime

Mike Penning: Today the Government published a new Code of Practice for Victims of Crime (the Victims' Code). The Victims’ Code sets out how victims must be treated by the criminal justice system. The Coalition Government updated the Victims’ Code to give victims clear entitlements. This government is committed to making sure that victims are recognised and treated in a respectful and sensitive manner. We are working to implement Directive 2012/29/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 (the Directive) by 16 November. The Victims’ Code is the primary means through which we are implementing the Directive. We consulted from 16 July to 16 August on some technical changes to the Code required to comply with the Directive’s minimum standards. In some respects we already go much further, such as enhanced entitlements for victims of the most serious crimes; a victim’s right to make a personal statement and to ask to read it in court; and special measures to help vulnerable witnesses to give their best evidence in and out of court. We intend to do even more. We have committed to introduce measures to increase further the rights of victims of crime and we will publish more detail in due course. We received 1,875 responses to the consultation, which we have carefully considered. As a result, we are proceeding as planned with the three main changes on which we consulted. The first main change broadens the definition of a victim under the Code, so that victims of all criminal offences are entitled to receive support and information, not just victims of the more serious criminal offences that are notifiable under the National Crime Recording Standards. The second main change means that victims are entitled to receive support and information services from relevant investigative and prosecutorial organisations, not just the police and Crown Prosecution Service. The third main change makes sure that a victim who reports a crime receives a written acknowledgment which states the basic elements of the criminal offence. We have also made smaller changes to the Code. The majority of these either codify what is already happening in practice or require small adjustments to existing policy or practice. A statutory instrument will be laid by 26 October which will bring the revised code into force on 16 November. Copies of the new Victims' Code are available in the Vote Office and the Printed Paper Office. The Government response to the consultation has been deposited in the libraries of both Houses. More information on the Victims’ Code and relevant consultation documents can be found on the Ministry of Justice website at: https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/revising-the-victims-code


This statement has also been made in the House of Lords: 
HLWS259

Smoking in Prisons

Andrew Selous: When I wrote to the Justice Select Committee on 29 September 2015 to announce our approach to smoking in prisons, I committed to inform Parliament through a written ministerial statement after recess. This statement confirms the announcement in my letter to the Justice Select Committee and does not add any detail.It is the intention of the Ministry of Justice to implement a full smoke free policy in all prisons in Wales from January 2016 and at 4 early adopter sites in England (HMPs Exeter, Channings Wood, Dartmoor and Erlestoke) from March.Since the introduction of smoking legislation in 2007, our desire has been to move towards smoke free prisons but, given the high prevalence of smoking and the unique environment of prisons, implementation of smoke free prisons is a challenge.National policy currently allows prisoners to smoke in their cells but not in communal areas. The National Offender Management Service (NOMS) has continued to keep this issue under review and introduced measures to reduce the risk of exposure to second hand smoke while ensuring order and control is maintained. This requires a careful and phased approach as we move towards fulfilling our long standing goal of smoke free prisons.Our steps to date include the recent and highly successful roll out of electronic cigarettes to all prisons. These are available in every prison shop and offer a comparable alternative to traditional tobacco products in cost terms. From next month, prisoners in open prisons will not be able to smoke indoors and will only be able to smoke in designated outdoor areas. Plans are also underway to provide voluntary smoke free areas in all prisons from early next year.However, we need to do more. Two recent academic studies commissioned by NOMS have identified that high levels of second hand smoke in some communal areas are still prevalent in some prisons. These were published on GOV.UK on 29 September 2015.The findings of these studies have reinforced our commitment to move towards smoke free prisons as soon as possible in a safe and controlled way.In developing our plans for smoke free prisons, we have learnt from a number of other jurisdictions who have already successfully implemented a smoke free policy across their prison estate. Canada has been smoke-free since 2008, New Zealand since 2011, and parts of Australia since 2013. Broadmoor Secure Hospital also went smoke free in 2007. We have used the lessons from their experiences to inform our strategy, including a long, phased implementation period, in order to move to smoke free safely.Following these preparations, we are now ready to move forward with these plans in a controlled and careful way. In partnership with the Welsh Government we will begin to implement a smoke free policy in all prisons in Wales (HMPs Cardiff, Parc, Swansea and Usk/Prescoed) from January 2016, and at 4 prisons in England (HMPs Exeter, Channings Wood, Dartmoor and Erlestoke) from March 2016. From now until the smoke free implementation date these prisons will be encouraging and supporting prisoners to stop smoking through a range of smoking cessation support and advice, including nicotine replacement therapy. We will continue to take a sensible and considered approach, using the experience of the first prisons to go smoke free to inform the speed at which we move to smoke free across our remaining prisons.We have no plans to move to smoke free prisons overnight and will only do so in a phased way that takes into account operational resilience and readiness of each prison. The operational safety and security of our prisons will always be our top priority.


This statement has also been made in the House of Lords: 
HLWS252

HM Treasury

Tax policy consultation and draft legislation

Mr David Gauke: At the start of the last Parliament, the coalition set out its ambition to improve the tax policy making process through high levels of consultation and legislative scrutiny. That approach was welcomed by tax professionals, and more than 150 formal and informal consultations on tax changes took place over the past five years. The commitment to publish the majority of Finance Bill clauses in draft was also met. This approach will continue into this Parliament. Following Summer Budget 2015, the Government has engaged with interested parties, seeking their views on more than 20 areas of tax policy for legislation in Finance Bill 2016. The next stage of consultation aims to ensure that the legislation works as intended. Draft clauses to be included in Finance Bill 2016 will be published on Wednesday 9 December 2015, together with responses to policy consultations, explanatory notes, tax information and impact notes and other accompanying documents. The consultation on the draft legislation will be open until Wednesday 3 February 2016.


This statement has also been made in the House of Lords: 
HLWS257

Department for Work and Pensions

Government response to Work and Pensions Select Committee report, Benefit sanctions policy beyond the Oakley Review

Mr Iain Duncan Smith: I have today provided the Government’s response to the Work and Pensions Select Committee report on benefit sanctions.I am very grateful for the Committee's work which has set out many helpful recommendations.We have been building a labour market system in which each claimant, closely assisted by a work coach, agrees the steps they need to take to secure a job, receives support to help them do so, and understands the requirements placed on them in return for their benefits. Last week’s labour market statistics showed the UK’s employment rate had reached 73.6%, the highest since records began; evidence that the system is working.Accepted by Labour, Coalition and Conservative Governments, sanctions are a necessary part of that system and we keep them under regular review, making improvements where necessary. In response to the Select Committee I am announcing that we will be introducing a number of changes.Prompted by the yellow card approach recommended by the Work and Pensions Select Committee, we will trial from early next year a system of warning before a sanction is imposed. At present people are notified of a sanction and it is imposed immediately afterwards. In some cases, claimants go on to challenge the decision and the sanction may be overturned. We will trial arrangements whereby claimants are given a warning of our intention to sanction and a 14 day period to provide evidence of good reason before the decision to sanction is made. During this time, claimants will have another opportunity to provide further evidence to explain their non-compliance. We will then review this information before deciding whether a sanction remains appropriate. We expect that this will strike the right balance between enforcing the claimant commitment and fairness.We will reintroduce automated JSA sanctions notifications. In 2001 under the last Labour Government, the process for issuing notifications was changed, replacing automated letters with arrangements whereby staff had to manually trigger a notification. Recent analysis assessed historic compliance with these arrangements when notifying of decisions of JSA sanctions as above 93%. The Department has introduced new checks to move compliance towards 100%, and will revert to the arrangements before 2001 of issuing letters automatically. The Department will write to claimants it has identified who may not have had a decision letter to explain the position. Further information for anyone who may have been affected will be available on gov.uk.We will consider extending the definition of “at risk” groups we use for hardship purposes to include those with mental health conditions and those who are homeless. This will mean that they can seek access to hardship from day 1 of a sanction being applied. We have recently accelerated the process for considering hardship claims so they are now paid within three days. Subject to further work on feasibility we will accept the Committee’s recommendation to have a decision maker set up an appointment to discuss hardship where a claimant is either vulnerable or has dependent children, a step which would help decisions to be made even more quickly.The Government sees sanctions as playing an important part in the labour market system, encouraging people to comply with conditions which will help them move into work. We want the sanctions system to be clear, fair and effective in promoting positive behaviours and we will continue to keep it under review so that it meets those aims.


This statement has also been made in the House of Lords: 
HLWS253

Department for International Development

Foreign Affairs Council for Development October 2015

Justine Greening: On 26 October, I will attend the Foreign Affairs Council for Development in Luxembourg. The meeting will be chaired by the High Representative of the European Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy Federica Mogherini. This is the first Council meeting since the new Agenda for Sustainable Development 2030, which the UK played a strong leadership role in shaping, was adopted by world leaders at the post-2015 Summit in September. As Secretary of State for International Development, I look forward to participating in the meeting to share the UK experience, including on humanitarian issues and improving the lives of girls and women, and to work with other Member States and the Commission to deliver the new Global Goals by 2030. The UK’s continued focus on international development is very much in the national interest.Agenda for Sustainable Development 2030I will strongly welcome and underline the UK’s continued commitment to championing and implementing the Global Goals. Building on the Prime Minister’s co-chairing of the UN High Level Panel, the UK played a key role in creating a set of goals that are universal and inclusive, underpinned by a commitment to leave no one behind. The new Global Goals address the key elements of the “golden thread”, including peace, governance and justice and also an unprecedented ambitious Goal on Women and Girls empowerment. The UK will continue to invest 0.7% of GNI on ODA and I will lobby others to meet their aid obligations. I will push the EU to come up with a comprehensive and ambitious plan for implementation.Migration and RefugeesMinisters will discuss preparations of the EU Africa Valletta Summit in November. It is the UK’s view that Valetta needs to demonstrate Europe’s leadership, commitment and ability to respond quickly to the serious problems posed by migrants crossing the Mediterranean. I believe Valletta needs a substantive discussion on tackling the root causes of migration, which are a mutual challenge faced by Europe and Africa – a lack of growth, jobs, opportunity in African countries – and the concrete actions needed to turn the situation around. The UK has been taking a leading role in ensuring that Valetta will address the underlying causes of migration and displacement. I will continue to press the Commission and other Member States to ensure that we approach Valletta with a positive and bold agenda.World Humanitarian SummitMinisters will discuss next year’s World Humanitarian Summit. I will strongly welcome the Summit, underlining the need to be ambitious and deliver genuinely transformative change. The UK’s key priorities are: (1) a focus on the protection of civilians and International Humanitarian Law, (2) building resilience to natural disasters, (3) a new approach to smart finance, (4) a strong focus on women and girls throughout the Summit. The Summit must deliver significant reforms to the way in which we address humanitarian crises, in particular those associated with long-term conflict. I am particularly concerned to ensure that we leave Istanbul with a better approach to supporting long-term refugees: they must be able to access livelihoods and education if they are to have hope for the future. The UK is committed to longer term financing for protracted crises, such as our work in Syria.Girls and womenOn girls and women, as successfully with the Global Goals, the UK has been a key actor in shaping and developing the new Gender Action Plan (2016-2020) (GAP). I have continuously pushed for girls and women to be prioritised in the new Commission. Moreover the UK’s important role in the GAP Taskforce has ensured the document demonstrates a significant shift in the Commissions commitment to girls and women. The publication of the new EU GAP provides a landmark opportunity for the EU to take significant steps forward in delivering tangible results for women and girls across the world. The Council will endorse the new GAP at the FAC-DEV. I will press for its full implementation, ensuring that the Commission and EEAS are held accountable when and where the GAP is not implemented.Post-CotonouThe Commission and European External Action Service (EEAS) have launched an online public consultation on the future of EU-ACP (Africa, Caribbean, and Pacific) relations once the Cotonou agreement expires in 2020. This is an important opportunity for the EU to modernise its relationship with the ACP, so that it is relevant, forward-looking and consistent with Agenda 2030. I will call for the Commission to keep all options open, base policy decisions on the evidence of Cotonou’s impact and actively seek a broad range of views during the consultation period, including with individual states and regional bodies that are inside and outside the ACP grouping.Council Conclusions and other agenda itemsCouncil Conclusions on the Gender Action Plan and Policy Coherence for Development will be approved. In addition, three AOB topics have been tabled: (1) Burkina Faso, (2) a joint letter from the Netherlands, France and Germany calling for a European initiative to support African Youth and (3) Capacity Building for Security and Development.


This statement has also been made in the House of Lords: 
HLWS251

Home Office

Proposed Council decisions on EU signature of (i) the Council of Europe Additional Protocol to the Convention on the Prevention of Terrorism 2005, and (ii) the Convention

Mr John Hayes: Further to the Explanatory Memorandum I deposited on 29 June, the Government has decided not to opt in to two Council Decisions relating to signature of the new Additional Protocol to the Council of Europe Convention on the Prevention of Terrorism and the 2005 Convention.The Additional Protocol contributes to the implementation of UN Security Council Resolution (UNSCR) 2178 on “Threats to international peace and security caused by terrorist acts” on tackling foreign fighters, which was unanimously adopted by the Security Council of the United Nations on 24 November 2014. It seeks to set a minimum standard for criminalisation of recruitment to, and receipt of training for, terrorism and the act of travelling abroad for the purpose of terrorism.The UK participated fully in the development of the Additional Protocol and has legislation in place which is compliant with the requirements of the Additional Protocol and the Convention. While we consider there to be value in signing the Additional Protocol, I remain of the view that this is a matter for Member States and do not agree with the European Commission’s assertion of exclusive EU competence.Security is a matter for national governments and national parliaments. Whilst co-operation across borders is important – indeed, often necessary – it is for the UK to judge what is best done in our national interest. Not opting in to these proposals will ensure that the UK cannot be caught by any exercise of EU competence in this area, in line with the previous Government’s decision not to opt back in to the EU Framework Decision 2002/475/JHA on combatting terrorism, as amended, under the Protocol 36 decision.


This statement has also been made in the House of Lords: 
HLWS258

Scientific Procedures on Living Animals

Mr John Hayes: My rt hon Friend the Minister of State, Home Office (Lord Bates) has today made the following written ministerial statement:My rt hon. Friend the Home Secretary (Theresa May) is today laying before the House “Statistics of Scientific Procedures on Living Animals Great Britain 2014” (HC 511)The adoption of the EU Directive 2010/63/EU has brought about changes to how the data on the use of animals in science is categorised, and provides consistency across EU Member States in the data to be published by the Commission in due course. There has been little change to the numbers or types of procedures that are required to be counted. However, the codification of the procedures has changed in line with the EU requirements for reporting.Overall, the annual statistical report shows a decrease (6%) in the total number of procedures (3.87 million) performed during 2014 compared with 2013. Of the total number of procedures 1.94 million (50%) are related to the creation/breeding of genetically altered animals that were not used in further procedures and the remaining 1.93million (50%) were experimental procedures. Given the changes to methodology the precise size of the reduction cannot be quantified.Mice, fish and rats were the most commonly used species in 2014 accounting for 86% of experimental procedures carried out.Specially protected species, horses, cats, dogs and non-human primates accounted for 0.8% (16,000) of experimental procedures (0.4% of all procedures) in 2014, the same proportion as in 2013.I particularly welcome the new requirement for the reporting of the actual severity experienced by animals in the course of procedures. The publication of actual severity increases transparency about the real harms of animal use and will help to drive improvements in welfare standards through targeted refinement initiatives.The severity of breeding procedures is considered separately from experimental procedures. Of the returns for severity for the 1.94 million breeding procedures, the majority (94%) of animals bred and not used in further procedures were classed as either sub-threshold or mild, 46% and 48% respectively. Only 4% were classed as moderate and 2% as severe. Of the returns for the 1.93 million experimental procedures, those classified as sub-threshold or mild were 9% and 51% respectively, 25% were classified as moderate and 8% as severe. A further 7% were classified as non-recovery.The latest statistical report and supplementary information, including those for previous years, can be found at: https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/statistics-of-scientific-procedures-on-living-animalsI am pleased to inform the House that I have also today placed in the Library the Annual Report of the Home Office Animals in Science Regulation Unit (ASRU) for the year 2014. The Annual Report can be found at https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/animals-in-science-regulation-unit-annual-report-2014 and describes how the Home Office has delivered its responsibilities under the Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986 to regulate the use of animals, implement the regulations as part of the delivery of the transposed Directive, and engaged with stakeholders. The report also provides details of inspection and cases of non-compliance and the outcomes of those cases concluded in 2014.The UK is a strong advocate for the life sciences. I am firmly committed to the properly regulated use of animals that continues to play an important role in improving the lives of humans and animals and the safety and sustainability of the environment. This Government seeks to maintain the UK’s world leading position by building on our strengths in the life sciences and innovation. To do this we must ensure the 3Rs (Replacement, Reduction and Refinement) are at the heart of what we do.I am pleased to, therefore, announce that from 1 November 2015, a policy ban on the testing of finished household products, and a qualified ban on the testing of ingredients primarily intended for use in household products, will come into effect. Testing of ingredients will only be exempt from the ban if there is a regulatory requirement for the testing, in which case testing can take place but retrospective notification will be required. In very exceptional circumstances, testing not required by regulations may be allowed but only after a full and detailed application has been considered and specific approval granted.I am also publishing two Advice Notes to support how we administer and enforce the Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986. The first Advice Note reaffirms my expectation that all project licence proposals will have fully considered all practicable opportunities to either re-home or set animals free after being used in research. However, the welfare of the animals must always be the primary consideration. Secondly, I am publishing advice on the re-use of animals under the Act. This Advice Note has the 3Rs at its core and aims to strike a balance between reduction and refinement considerations, taking account of the legal constraints on keeping animals alive and re-using them in further procedures.The UK has a proud tradition of high-quality science coupled with high standards of animal welfare. Both these documents, together with the other announcements I have made in this statement today, aim to support these important considerations.


This statement has also been made in the House of Lords: 
HLWS255

Foreign and Commonwealth Office

Foreign Affairs Council and General Affairs Council: 12–13 October

Mr David Lidington: My Right Honourable Friend the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs attended the Foreign Affairs Council on 12 October. The Foreign Affairs Council was chaired by the High Representative of the European Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, Federica Mogherini. The General Affairs Council was chaired by the Luxembourg Presidency. The meetings were held in Luxembourg.Foreign Affairs CouncilA provisional report of the meeting and Conclusions adopted can be found at:http://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/meetings/fac/2015/10/12/The Foreign Affairs Council (FAC) met to discuss Libya, Syria, Migration and EU/Africa, Caribbean, Pacific (ACP) Post-Cotonou. Ms Mogherini also updated on violence in the Middle East and condemned the Ankara terrorist attacks in her opening remarks. Ms Mogherini noted the upcoming ASEM (Asia-Europe Meeting) conference in November and said that the Foreign Affairs Council would discuss Belarus at the November Council.LibyaMs Mogherini welcomed the agreement to establish a Government of National Accord (GNA) in Libya, and made clear that the EU should encourage all parties to sign up to the agreement and be ready to support it. The FAC subsequently agreed supportive and positive Council Conclusions. Details of the support package, which would focus on capacity and institution building as well as the restoration of basic services, particularly health, would be finalised in partnership with the GNA to ensure their buy in and ownership. The Foreign Secretary made clear that the important but fragile agreement needed the EU’s full support. The Foreign Secretary also highlighted that the UK and UN would be co-hosting in London a planning meeting on international support to a GNA.SyriaMinisters discussed many aspects of the situation in Syria, including the political process, the recent Russian intervention and the migration crisis. Ms Mogherini said in her opening remarks that the EU had a role to play in support of the UN political process, and later noted that EU Member States needed to ensure unity by continuing to coordinate closely. The Foreign Secretary argued that the attacks by Russia on the Syrian opposition and civilians was unacceptable and would set back the prospect of a political solution. All Member States agreed that support for the UN-led political process must continue, with the Foreign Secretary making clear that any process must involve a transition away from Assad, who could not be part of Syria’s future.MigrationOver lunch the Council discussed the external aspects of migration, covering the Eastern Mediterranean, Western Balkans and the Central Mediterranean routes. There was broad support for increasing work on the upstream aspects of migration and for Turkey as a strategic partner.EU / ACP relations Post-CotonouMs Mogherini and Johannes Hahn (Commissioner for European Neighbourhood Policy and Enlargement Negotiations) presented the Joint Consultation Paper on EU/ACP relations post-Cotonou. Detailed discussion would formally begin at the Foreign Affairs Council (Development) on Monday 26 October. Ms Mogherini underlined that the post-Cotonou agenda also covered a range of non-development issues: Foreign Ministers would therefore return to the subject next year.Ministers agreed without discussion a number of measures:The Council approved the High Representative’s report on the twenty-first and twenty-second Operation ALTHEA six-monthly review.The Council adopted conclusions on Libya.The Council adopted conclusions on Syria.The Council adopted conclusions on migration.The Council adopted conclusions on Bosnia and Herzegovina.The Council adopted conclusions on South Sudan.The Council authorised the European Commission and the High Representative to open negotiations on a new, legally binding and overarching agreement with Armenia and adopted a corresponding negotiating mandate.The Council amended the agreement establishing the association between the EU and Chile.The Council decided to extend until the end of April 2016 the validity of an existing Council decision in support of the practical implementation of UN Security Council Resolution 1540 (2004) on non-proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and their means of delivery.The Council decided to continue the EU’s support for the activities of the preparatory Commission of the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organisation (CTBTO).The Council amended the restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria.The Council amended the statements of reasons for persons and groups subject to restrictive measures with a view to combating terrorism.The Council approved a recast version of decision 2011/411/CFSP, which established the European Defence Agency, to improve the clarity of the legal text.General Affairs CouncilA provisional report of the meeting and Conclusions adopted can be found at:http://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/meetings/gac/2015/10/13/The General Affairs Council (GAC) on 13 October focussed on preparation of the European Council on 15 October 2015, and the 2016 Commission Work Programme. Under Any Other Business, the GAC considered the Inter-institutional Agreement on Better Regulation and meeting in the margins of the Employment, Social Policy, Health and Consumer Affairs Council.Preparation of the October European CouncilThe GAC prepared the agenda for the 15 October European Council, which the Prime Minister attended. The October European Council discussed migration, reviewed progress on Economic and Monetary Union, and received an update on the UK’s renegotiation, including the state of play of technical talks and intentions for the process ahead. The European Council also considered external relations issues, including Libya, Syria, and Turkey.On migration, I strongly supported the emphasis in the draft Council Conclusions on a comprehensive approach to the issue. I also suggested we step up our engagement with Turkey.2016 Commission Work ProgrammeThe GAC took note of the Commission’s letter of intent for their 2016 Work Programme and the Presidency’s draft response on behalf of Member States. I welcomed the overall content of the letter of intent, and emphasised the need for continued ambition on completing the single market.Inter-institutional Agreement on Better Regulation (IIA)The Luxembourg Presidency updated the GAC on the IIA negotiations. Tripartite political talks between the Presidency (representing the Council), the European Parliament and the Commission will continue in the coming months. I emphasised the important role of national parliaments in EU decision-making.Meeting in the margins of the Employment, Social Policy, Health and Consumer Affairs CouncilDenmark expressed concern about a recent meeting of ministers from eurozone countries held in the margins of the Employment, Social Policy, Health and Consumer Affairs Council (EPSCO) on 5 October. I had signed a joint letter from non-eurozone Member States to the President of the General Affairs Council expressing concern at the planned meeting. During the GAC, I repeated our concern that the meeting had gone ahead and emphasised the need for any further such discussion to include all Member States. This position was supported by all non-eurozone members and some eurozone members.


This statement has also been made in the House of Lords: 
HLWS260

Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs

Agenda for October Agriculture and Fisheries Council

Elizabeth Truss: The next Agriculture and Fisheries Council will be on 22 October in Luxembourg. My Hon friend, the Minister of State for Farming, Food and Marine Environment (George Eustice), will represent the UK. As the provisional agenda stands, the following items will be discussed: There will be a proposal for a Council Regulation fixing the 2016 fishing opportunities for certain fish stocks and groups of fish stocks in the Baltic Sea, as well as an exchange of views on the EU-Norway 2016 consultations. An exchange of views on climate friendly agriculture will also take place. There are currently five confirmed Any Other Business items:- The use of plant protection products in sustainable agriculture (requested by the Netherlands);- Report on the necessity, if any, of provisions for milk-based products destined for infants and sports products (requested by France);- GMO-free agriculture in Europe (requested by Slovenia);- Antimicrobial resistance (requested by Germany);- Information presented by the Visegrad Group countries (Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland and Slovakia) plus Bulgaria, Austria, Romania and Slovenia, on agricultural markets development, particularly with regards to the dairy sector, and best practices in land management including soil protection and management (requested by Czech Republic). 


This statement has also been made in the House of Lords: 
HLWS254